Jones v. Allan et al

Filing 27

ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 26 . Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute and to obey the orders of this Court. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 26, 2009. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION BOBBY JONES V. SHERIFF MIKE ALLEN; JAIL ADMINISTRATOR JEFF MARVIN; ASSISTANT JAIL ADMINISTRATOR LT. VENA CUPP and NURSE NICK TAYLOR ORDER On this 26th day of August 2009, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on August 3, 2009, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. 26). (Doc. Civil No. 08-2054 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. On June 22, 2009, the Court mailed Plaintiff a questionnaire to assist him in responding to Defendant's summary judgment motion. Plaintiff failed to return the questionnaire by July 24, 2009 as directed, and the questionnaire was not returned to the Court as undeliverable. The Court mailed Plaintiff a copy of the report and recommendation to the same address, and it was returned as undeliverable and marked "return to sender, vacant, unable to forward". Plaintiff has not AO72A (Rev. 8/82) provided the Court with a change of address or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and to obey the orders of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?