Kirby v. Crawford County Detention Center et al
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by James Edward Kirby. Objections to R&R due by 9/21/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on September 2, 2009. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS F O R T SMITH DIVISION
J A M E S EDWARD KIRBY v. C iv il No. 08-2063
DEPUTY WATERDOWN; D E P U T Y ISREAL BURGOS; SHERIFF M IK E ALLEN; and JAIL ADMINISTRATOR J E F F MARVIN
R E P O R T AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE P la in tiff, James Edward Kirby (hereinafter Kirby), filed this civil rights action pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. O n August 10, 2009, Kirby filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 23). In the motion, Kirby s ta te s he does not wish to go forward with this case. Defendants have orally advised the court th e y have no objection to the motion. A c c o rd in gly, I recommend that the motion (Doc. 23) be granted and this case be d is m is s e d with prejudice. T h e parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely o b je c tio n s may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are r e m in d e d that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the d is tr ic t court. DATED this 2nd day of September 2009.
HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1 -
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?