King v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Filing
9
JUDGMENT REVERSING AND REMANDING CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 4, 2009. (lw)
l N 1'HEl.JNIl STATFS ljD t)tStRIC'tLr(lIItil' (]I-' WF,S I'IiRNDISTRIC]'I N RKANSAS F O R I 'SN'II'I T)IVISION H
KING BOIJ]-}Y
P I AII'i lilrl.'
c l v l l . N0. ()ri-20ii8
(lornrrtissionur' M I C H A E I , J. AS I Rt.lF., Adnrinistration Sccuritv Social
I)FFI]]\'DAN I'
.tUDcMr,j\I , l r I I N o wonrhis Aay _1ffif ?009. corrrcs tirrconsictr.rarion arrd or on lhelteprrn lftfu
\ R c c o m r t r e r r t l a t i o n .luly 17.l0t)9. hy the I lonoruble datdd I lrritecl .larlcsR. fularsclrewski. Slates M a g i s t r a i eJudgc f'or the WestcrnI)istrict of Ark{rrsus. t cn ( l(}) days havc passerl without heing lilcd by the pnrtics. l he Llourt has rcview+tlthis ctrse, otrjections and beingwcll arid s u l l i c i " ' n t ladvised" y and is lindsthatth(rRep(ut ltcconr rrrcndalion ploperancl shoLrlrl adoptcd he i n its cr'r[iretv. Accordirglv, thc Court hereLry the adopts RepoltanrlRecornrnenclation: rever$es t h e decisionof thrr Commissioner; irnd rcrlarrdl;lhis casc to the Llornmissjonrrlirl lLrlhcr pursuant $entencc considcration f'ourc{ 4? U.S.Ll.g 405(g). t() I l plaintiff wishesto rcqucslan awardof irttttrney and oosl underthc l.iqualAc:cess f'ocs Acl t o Jrtsticc (EA.IA)2lt l.l.S.Cl, 2412,an irpplicaljorr lrelilcd uJrunlil 30 daysaflcrthe nrul { "not i.rppealahlc" i.e..30 daysatlcr the {i0{ay tinrc lirr appeal crrclcd. ,\irtr becotncs has .ludgrnent. -5t)9 tl.S. 203. .,296. lll S h t r / a l t r,. iit:hut:,lir', 28 tl,S,C. ,rl$ S.(lt. 2a)?5 (1q-9-'i)l
?4rr(dxrxB).(dx2xc)
I T I S S OO R D E R I D .
ti\v\
- ._J
. r'
r
ii -_.I :"".t ,, - f--
restEft$pffi$tr$tffi[sn,
0 AU6 4 2009
cHBtB.Jfit{60rri, S ct-EBK
E{
AO72A (Rev.8/82)
H 0 N .ROIIriR DAWSON r"r" U N I T I DS'I'A'IES RIC'I DIS'I JUT)CI
IIEPIIIfl,.ffiK Y
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?