Kesterson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 9

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and REVERSING AND REMANDING case to Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on July 31, 2009. (rw)

Download PDF
I N THE LINITI-ID Al LS DISI RICl COIJtt f SI W L SI ITRN DISI'RICT ARKANSAS OF F O R T M T T ID I V I S I O N S I I ) E B R AANN KESTERSON C I V I LN O . 0 8 - 1 0 7 1 M I ( I H A E L J. ASTRLiI-, issioncr ilorrinr S o c i a lSccurityAdrninistration PJ,4Ih]I']IIJT DLiI;[iNI)ANT .ITJD(;MENT 'itt* N o w on this C 1-!tavof dU h-t b I (.lnitcd Itttontntcndation dritcd.luly 13,?009,tr;-the I lonorahlc.larnr:s Marschcwski, Sli\lts R. 'l M a g i s t r ' I r t.ludgelirt the Westem District of Arkansas. rn ( l0) dirys have passed e wil.horrt o b . i c c t i o n bcing filcd h_v parties. The {lourt hns rcvicwctl this casc.and hciug wcll iurd s the s u l l i c i e n t l advised. y findsthatthc Rtp()rt (l Ii ccorlnrendationpropelandshould atloptcd hr a is i r rits cntircLy. Accorrlingly, Llourlhcrcbyadopts ltcpLrrt reverieJj lhe thr irrrdltcuonrrncntlrlior]; t h c clccision ol'the Conrrlissioner:iind rernands this casc to thc (lort lissionr:rIor lirrlher' pr.rfsuant slrntcnce lirul ol'4? tj.S.(l, { 405(g). consitlelation tr) I f plaintill'wishcstrr rcllucstarrawird ()f itll()nrey lbesantl cost underlhr [qual Acctss t o Juslice (EAJA) 28 L,.S.Ll, irPplicalion Lre Act the $ may liled up until 3()daysafieL "not appcalahlt"i.t..30 da;"raliel lhe 6{)'riay becomes has ,*rtr tirnefor appeal cntlc,cl, .judgrrient , l h t t l a l n v. Sthutfitr, 509 t;.S 29?, ?96, ll,l S.Lt, 1625 (19!)l); 2lJ t.j.:i,C. $$ t l thc and JfJ09. comes lor considerati('ui ltL-pon on 2 4r2(d)()(B).(tx?)(.j) | I l ts so oRt)E,Rlll). I N J N [t(i8ht{l L D.\WSON I - IINI'fF]T) .IL;DCL S'|A.II]S DIS'IITIC]l J U L | 200e 3 AO72A (Rev,8i82) ET oHHS JflJNsq,t, n. 0LEHK DEPfiY CIERK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?