Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc.
Filing
93
JUDGMENT that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 13, 2011. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
WILLIAM BLANKENSHIP, JR.
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 2:08-CV-02074
USA TRUCK, INC.
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
On the 11th day of October 2011, this matter came on for trial to a duly selected jury
consisting of eight members, the undersigned presiding. At the completion of the three day trial, the
case was submitted to the jury on interrogatories and a unanimous verdict was reached as to each
interrogatory as follows:
INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that USA Truck,
Inc. fraudulently induced William Blankenship to enter into the Release and Settlement Agreement
dated March 6, 2006, as provided for in Instruction 15?
Yes
X
No
Based upon the jury’s answer to the above interrogatory, the jury was not required to
complete any remaining interrogatories. The verdict form was signed and dated by the jury
foreperson. In accordance with the above verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED,
that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of October, 2011.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?