Thomas v. Cupp et al

Filing 46

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 44 45 in their entirety and denying defendants' 41 Motion to Dismiss; further granting defendant's 34 Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 14, 2011. (rw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
LEAMON THOMAS

PLAINTIFF

v.

Case No. 08-2138

LT. VENA CUPP, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Now on this 14th day of September 2011, there comes on for
consideration the reports and recommendations filed herein on
August 26, 2010, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United
States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Docs. 44-45).

No objections to the reports and recommendations

were filed.
The

court

sufficiently

has

reviewed

advised,

finds

this
as

case

and,

follows:

being
The

well

and

reports

and

recommendations are proper and should be and hereby are adopted in
their entirety.

Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (doc.

41) is DENIED, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc.
34) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)