Stokes v. Carson et al
ORDER directing defendants to file motion for summary judgment on or before 11/6/09. Plaintiff is directed not to respond to the motion for summary judgment until so ordered by the court. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 6, 2009. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WE S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FO R T SMITH DIVISION M IC H A E L STOKES v. WILLIAM CARSON, Jailer, S eb astian County Jail; FRANK ATKINSON; Sheriff, S eb astian County; and O FFIC ER JOHN DEVANE, Lt. Administrator, Sebastian C o u n ty Jail ORDER A s it appears this case may be resolved on motion for summary judgment, the defendants a re directed to file such a motion on or before November 6, 2009. Once the summary judgment m o tio n is filed, the court will prepare a questionnaire to assist the plaintiff in responding to the m o tio n . For this reason, plaintiff is directed not to respond to the motion for summary judgment u n til so ordered by the court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of August 2009. C iv il No. 09-2012 PLAINTIFF
D E FE N D A N T S
HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?