Myers v. Firestone Rogers Ave. Store
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Carl Edward Myers. Objections to R&R due by 10/23/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on October 5, 2009. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION CARL EDWARD MYERS v. FIRESTONE - ROGERS AVE. STORE CASE No. 09-2079 DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff's complaint has been filed pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act on July 10, 2009. (Doc. 1). On that same date, the Court provided
an addendum to the Plaintiff, in order to assist the Court with reviewing Plaintiff's Complaint and his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff was ordered to complete and return the addendum on or before August 10, 2009. Plaintiff has not returned the addendum to the Court. Moreover, Plaintiff has continued to correspond with the Court and has provided no new address. No mail has been returned to the Court from Plaintiff. Accordingly, it is the recommendation of the undersigned that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) be dismissed for failure to obey a Court Order and/or for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. The parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. DATED this 5th day of October 2009.
/s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?