Ritchie v. Cupp et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING 41 , 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety. Accordingly Defendants' 37 MOTION to Dismiss is denied and Defendants' 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted. Further Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 20, 2011. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION REX LEE RITCHIE PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 09-2097 LT. VENA CUPP, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 20th day of September 2011, there comes on for consideration the reports and recommendations filed herein on August 24, 2011 (doc. 41) and August 30, 2011 (doc. 43), by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No objections to the reports and recommendations were filed. The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well and reports and recommendations are proper and should be and hereby are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (doc. 37) is DENIED, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 28) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?