Ritchie v. Cupp et al
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING 41 , 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety. Accordingly Defendants' 37 MOTION to Dismiss is denied and Defendants' 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted. Further Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 20, 2011. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
REX LEE RITCHIE
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 09-2097
LT. VENA CUPP, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 20th day of September 2011, there comes on for
consideration the reports and recommendations filed herein on
August 24, 2011 (doc. 41) and August 30, 2011 (doc. 43), by the
Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for
the Western District of Arkansas. No objections to the reports and
recommendations were filed.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
reports
and
recommendations are proper and should be and hereby are adopted in
their entirety.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (doc.
37) is DENIED, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc.
28) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?