Williams v. Peterson
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Further Plaintiff's complaint is also DISMISSED for her failure to prosecute this action and to obey the order of this Court and on the grounds that the claims are asserted against an individual who is immune from suit. Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal is considered a "strike" for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 29, 2009. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION SHIRLEY ANN WILLIAMS v. CIRCUIT JUDGE WILLIAM PEARSON ORDER Now on this 29th day of December 2009, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on Case No. 09-2126 PLAINTIFF
December 8, 2009, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 7). The Plaintiff did not file timely, written objections. court has reviewed finds this as case and, being The well and and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for her
failure to prosecute this action and to obey the order of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff's Complaint is also
DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are asserted against an individual who is immune from suit. See 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal is considered a 28
"strike" for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. U.S.C. § 1915(g).
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?