Erdman Company et al v. Phoenix Land & Acquisition, LLC et al
ORDER granting 74 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. Further, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs' claims against Separate Defendants First National Bank of Fort Smith, Harris Company of Fort Smith, Inc., Nauc Properties, LLC, Arvest Bank and Benefit Bank are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on November 14, 2011. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
ERDMAN COMPANY and
ERDMAN ARCHITECTURE &
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-2045
PHOENIX LAND & ACQUISITION, LLC;
PHOENIX HEALTH, LLC; BENEFIT
BANK; ARVEST BANK; THE FIRST
NATIONAL BANK OF FORT SMITH;
NAUC PROPERTIES, LLC; and HARRIS
COMPANY OF FORT SMITH, INC.
ERDMAN COMPANY and ERDMAN
ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING COMPANY
DATA TESTING, INC.;
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY; and
LONG’S DRILLING SERVICE, INC.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. (ECF No. 74). Plaintiffs
move the Court to dismiss the lawsuit against Separate Defendants Benefit Bank, Arvest Bank, The
First National Bank of Fort Smith, NAUC Properties, LLC, and Harris Company of Fort Smith, Inc.
Upon consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Pursuant
to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs’ claims against Separate
Defendants Benefit Bank, Arvest Bank, The First National Bank of Fort Smith, NUAC Properties,
LLC, and Harris Company of Fort Smith, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of November, 2011.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Hon. Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?