Erdman Company et al v. Phoenix Land & Acquisition, LLC et al

Filing 79

ORDER granting 74 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. Further, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs' claims against Separate Defendants First National Bank of Fort Smith, Harris Company of Fort Smith, Inc., Nauc Properties, LLC, Arvest Bank and Benefit Bank are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on November 14, 2011. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION ERDMAN COMPANY and ERDMAN ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING COMPANY VS. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 2:10-CV-2045 PHOENIX LAND & ACQUISITION, LLC; PHOENIX HEALTH, LLC; BENEFIT BANK; ARVEST BANK; THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT SMITH; NAUC PROPERTIES, LLC; and HARRIS COMPANY OF FORT SMITH, INC. DEFENDANTS ERDMAN COMPANY and ERDMAN ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING COMPANY THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS VS. DATA TESTING, INC.; OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY; and LONG’S DRILLING SERVICE, INC. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. (ECF No. 74). Plaintiffs move the Court to dismiss the lawsuit against Separate Defendants Benefit Bank, Arvest Bank, The First National Bank of Fort Smith, NAUC Properties, LLC, and Harris Company of Fort Smith, Inc. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs’ claims against Separate Defendants Benefit Bank, Arvest Bank, The First National Bank of Fort Smith, NUAC Properties, LLC, and Harris Company of Fort Smith, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of November, 2011. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Hon. Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?