Piaquadio v. American Legal Funding, LLC et al
Filing
40
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Bond. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 1, 2012. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
ADAM PIAQUADIO
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 10-2066
AMERICAN LEGAL FUNDING, LLC
and ALFUND AZ1, LLC
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On this 1st day of May 2012, there comes on for consideration,
Defendants’ Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 62, to Stay Execution
Pending Appeal and Approve Supersedeas Bond (doc. 34). Also before
the Court is Plaintiff’s Response (doc. 39).
For the reasons
stated herein, the Court finds Defendants’ Motion (doc. 34) is
DENIED.
After a hearing on June 30, 2011, the Court entered a default
judgment against Defendants in the amount of $452,940.00 and
interest at the rate of 0.17% per annum until paid.
2012,
the
judgment.
Court
denied
Defendants’
motion
to
On March 27,
set
aside
the
On April 19, 2012, Defendants filed their Notice of
Appeal (doc. 35).
Defendants request this Court to stay enforcement of the money
judgment pending the outcome of their appeal.
Defendants further
request that this Court approve a supersedeas bond in the amount of
$5000.00 rather than the full amount of the judgment as Defendants’
assets are insufficient to allow them to post a bond in the full
1
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
amount.
Plaintiff
objects
to
the
amount
of
the
requested
supersedeas bond.
Generally, the amount of a supersedeas bond should include
both the principal amount of the judgment and provide for costs.
Am. Mfrs. Mut. Co. v. Am. Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., 87
S.
Ct.
1,
1
(1966).
The
default
judgment
entered
against
Defendants was in the amount of $452,940.00, and a $5000.00 bond is
insufficient to protect Plaintiff’s interest in that judgment.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion (doc. 34) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
2
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?