Westbrook et al v. Hudson et al

Filing 20

ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 19 Motion to Dismiss. Further this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 22, 2012. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION AMBER WESTBROOK and BROOKE ELSWORTH v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 2:10-CV-02079 DAVID HUDSON, Individually and as Sebastian County Judge; FRANK ATKINSON, Individually and as Sebastian County Sheriff; MIKE CONGER, Individually and as Administrator of the Sebastian County Detention Center; LEON WOOD, Individually and as a member of the Sebastian County Sheriff’s Department and/or Sebastian County Detention Center; and JOHN DOES 1-3 DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19). IT APPEARING to the Court that the matter has been settled, it is ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 19) be GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT. If any party desires to make the terms of the settlement a part of the record herein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the Court within thirty days from the file date of this Order. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and that a party wishes this Court to enforce the settlement agreement specifically. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of October, 2012. s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?