Barton v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 4

ORDER denying 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to provisionally file the complaint nunc pro tunc at of 6/10/10. Plaintiff is directed to tender the filing fee of $350.00 on or before 6/30/10. Should Plaintiff fail to comply within the required period of time, her complaint will become subject to summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on June 16, 2010. (lw)

Download PDF
I N ' I ' H TIJNITF]D ] STATES DISTRICT COIjRT WES'I.IRN DIS'IRIC'IOIJARKANSAS F O R TSMITHDIVISION L\TJETTE BARTON S, PI,AINTIFF Crvrr.N0 |D_ebg4 M I C H A E L . I . ASTRI.IE,Conrrrissionor S o c i a lSccuriwAdministration DEFENDANT ORDER with O n.Iune 0, 201 Plain fTsubrniltedconrpliunt fi ling in thisdistrict, 1 0, ti a fbr togelher pauprris ("IFP").PlaintiffsIFPappJication a request leave proceed for to in.fbnna reveals lhat shcis maruied hasoneminor child, Plaintiffandlier hushand and own a homeworlh $240,500, onwhichtheyowe and Plaintiffhas totalof $725.00 a inher $161,000, four(4)motorvehicles. c h c c k i n g savings and accounts. has ernployment income She no or ofher own,butrelies solely lin'tirrppoil. reasr)fls F()r below,I)laintifl-s tnotion to o n herhushand's $60,000 salary sitirted p t r c e e d P is dcnicd. IF that litigants have entre, a an rot T h epurpose I'2tl ( l.S.(1. I 9l 5 is to cnsurc incligcnt o $ (quoting h a r l i e rto thef'ederal . courts.h rc.I|illiumton,T86F.2dI336, l33ll (llth Cir. 1986) nded hc nol S t r u d e r McGuire,516 v. F.2d820,823(3rdtlir. 1975)).Althouglr clainrant ir " c o m p l e t e ldestitute" lakeardvantage IFP statutc. or shcmustshow y o1'the hc thatpaying the to F.2d f i l i n gfcc wouldrcsultin anundue financial hardship. IVillimnsttn,7Bd at 1338. I ' l a i n t i f fhasnot provided sufficient evidence justily a waiverol thc liling fcc. A to ttt an it is n u r n b cofcouftshave r lecogrrized ifl rtirking IIP dctcrtnitration. prr.rper oonsidet thdt, frornhisor herfhmily. ,Scc indigent status leceives linancialsupport whethethepaty clairning r of v, 2(nq WL 3379021 3 (N,D.W. Va.October 2009); at 16, Frirlnun r,.(.tity New P y ' e r Astrue, (quoting illturns 20-5, F. 2d D.N.Y. 2002) lf v.,Sptrnt 455 F. Supp. er, Y o r k . 1 9 5 Supp. 534,537 (S. AO72A ( R e v . 8/82) y 2 0 8 - 0 9(tl. Md. 1978));Assaad-Faltas [Jniversit1t South(-]urolinu,971 Supp.985, 990 rl F. n . 9 (D.S.C.1997);Lee v. WaLMart Stttrttt, Inc., l99l WL 3l 6756 at 3 (N.ll. hrd. August 18, 1 9 9 3 ) .Hcrc.Plaintiffis by no means destitr.rte. ownsrealestate, She lbur vehicles, receivcs and s u p p o r tlionr lrerhusband's Plaintil'l'has no $60,000salary.Iiurthcrmorc. ol'l'ered reasons why h e r hu$htndwould be unwilling or unalrle providcthc furrds to ncccssary Iile her conrplaint. t() F o r thesereasolr$, find that a waiver ofthe filing fcc in this casewould he inappropriate. we A c c o r d i n g l yPlaintiffs rnotionfor leave proceed is DENIED. The clerk is . kr IFP d i r e c t e d provisionally the complaiil nunr pro larrcas of Junc 10,201 Plaintiffis to lile 0. d i t e c t e d tender liling lbeol'$350on or lrefirre to the June30, 2010. Should Plaintifffail to peliocl c o m p l ywithin the required o1'tinre. complaint hel will becorne subject sulnrriary to dismiss afor failureto obeya courtorder. l I T lS S() ORIIERITDthis I6rhday of Jr.rnc 2010. JAMES ltslEftBpHldfr$Yf,lsn.r R.MARSCIIEWSKI H I E F I.].S, MACISTRATEJUDCE J U N 6 20t0 | CHRIS R. JfrII{$S{, OIERK BY DEPHYq..BK AO72A (Rev.8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?