Wright v. John Joplin et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit, or fail to state claims on which relief can be granted. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 25, 2010. (rw)

Wright v. John Joplin et al

Doc. 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION JAMES BRIAN WRIGHT v. Case No. 10-2122 PLAINTIFF

JOHN JOPLIN, Sebastian County Public Defender; PAUL HUGHES, Sebastian County Public Defender; STACEY SLAUGHTER, Sebastian County Prosecuting Attorney; SEBASTIAN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; and SEBASTIAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS' OFFICE ORDER

DEFENDANTS

Now on this 25th day of October 2010, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on October 5, 2010, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. objections were filed. The court has reviewed finds this as case and, being The well and and (Doc. 6). No

sufficiently

advised,

follows:

report

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED on the

grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit, or fail to state claims on which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii)(IFP action The Court declines

may be dismissed on such grounds at any time).

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims.

AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Dockets.Justia.com

28 U.S.C. § 1367. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge

AO72A (Rev. 8/82)