Wheeler v. Tinsman et al
Filing
43
SCHEDULING ORDER for evidentiary hearing. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 23, 2013. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
GARY LEE WHEELER, JR.
v.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 2:11CV2002
DR. TINSMAN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
SCHEDULING ORDER
Within thirty (30) days of the scheduled evidentiary hearing,
the parties are directed to file the following:
1. An information sheet setting forth the following
information for each witness you desire to call:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
2.
Name
Address
Identification (for example, mother of plaintiff)
Prisoner Number (if witness is a prisoner and
number is known)and,
Very brief description of expected testimony and
length of time of expected testimony;
As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis, the Court will issue all subpoenas and writs on the
Plaintiff’s behalf.
However, no subpoenas or writs may be issued
unless Plaintiff provides a timely response to this order.
3.
Copies of any exhibits you desire to enter into
evidence at the hearing.
Each party is directed to serve a copy of the information
sheet upon the other party.
The parties are not required to serve
copies of proposed exhibits.
Motions to amend pleadings or to join other parties must be
filed no later than thirty (30) days prior to trial.
Motions not
timely filed may be denied solely for that reason.
If this case should be continued, this scheduling order shall
remain in effect unless otherwise directed by the court in its
order of continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23RD
day of April, 2013.
/s/ J. Marschewski
HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?