Wheeler v. Tinsman et al

Filing 43

SCHEDULING ORDER for evidentiary hearing. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 23, 2013. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION GARY LEE WHEELER, JR. v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 2:11CV2002 DR. TINSMAN, et al. DEFENDANTS SCHEDULING ORDER Within thirty (30) days of the scheduled evidentiary hearing, the parties are directed to file the following: 1. An information sheet setting forth the following information for each witness you desire to call: A. B. C. D. E. 2. Name Address Identification (for example, mother of plaintiff) Prisoner Number (if witness is a prisoner and number is known)and, Very brief description of expected testimony and length of time of expected testimony; As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, the Court will issue all subpoenas and writs on the Plaintiff’s behalf. However, no subpoenas or writs may be issued unless Plaintiff provides a timely response to this order. 3. Copies of any exhibits you desire to enter into evidence at the hearing. Each party is directed to serve a copy of the information sheet upon the other party. The parties are not required to serve copies of proposed exhibits. Motions to amend pleadings or to join other parties must be filed no later than thirty (30) days prior to trial. Motions not timely filed may be denied solely for that reason. If this case should be continued, this scheduling order shall remain in effect unless otherwise directed by the court in its order of continuance. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23RD day of April, 2013. /s/ J. Marschewski HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?