Nixon v. Shue et al
Filing
6
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, re 4 , and his complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Report and Recommendations re 5 are adopted in their entirety, 2 . Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, is denied as moot, 5 . ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on June 7, 2011. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
LARRY J. NIXON
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 11-2059
DANIEL SHUE, Prosecutor,
12th Judicial District and
PROFESSOR JIM CHRISTIANSEN,
University of Arkansas, Fort Smith
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now
on
this
7th
day
of
June
2011,
there
comes
on
for
consideration the report and recommendation filed on May 17, 2011,
by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate
Judge for the Western District of Arkansas (Doc. 5). No objections
were filed to the report and recommendation.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is
GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (doc. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?