Wilson v. Peppas et al

Filing 31

JUDGMENT, the Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is dismissed with prejudice. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 23, 2012. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION JERALD E. WILSON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:11-CV-02062 JAYSON PEPPAS, Individually DEFENDANT JUDGMENT On the 22nd day of October, 2012, this matter came on for trial to a duly selected jury consisting of ten members, the undersigned presiding. At the completion of the two-day trial, the case was submitted to the jury and a unanimous verdict was reached as follows: On the civil rights claim of Plaintiff Jerald E. Wilson against Defendant Jayson Peppas, as submitted in Instructions Nos. 3-4, we find in favor of: ________________________________________________Jayson Peppas_______________ (Plaintiff Jerald E. Wilson) or (Defendant Jayson Peppas) On the malicious prosecution claim of Plaintiff Jerald E. Wilson against Defendant Jayson Peppas, as submitted in Instruction No. 5, we find in favor of: ________________________________________________Jayson Peppas_______________ (Plaintiff Jerald E. Wilson) or (Defendant Jayson Peppas) The verdict form was signed and dated by the jury foreperson. In accordance with the above verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 23rd day of October, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?