Fields v. Sharum et al
Filing
16
ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and adopting Report and Recommendations in it's entirety. The Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the grounds that Plaintiff fails to state claims on which re lief can be granted. Further Plaintiff has named defendants who are immune from suit or who are not state actors and has made no official capacity claims without alleging any policy, custom, or practice for official capacity liability. Finally this dismissal is considered a "strike" pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and the U.S. District Clerk is directed to appropriately flag this case. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 2, 2011. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
MARCUS FIELDS
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 11-2108
TIMOTHY SHARUM, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 2nd day of November 2011, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on October
11, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc. 15).
Plaintiff has not filed timely, written objections.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motions to Proceed IFP (docs.
1 & 12) are DENIED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE on the grounds that Plaintiff fails to state claims on
which relief can be granted.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-
(iii)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time).
Further, Plaintiff has named as defendants individuals who are
immune from suit or who are not state actors and has made official
capacity claims without alleging any policy, custom, or practice
for official capacity liability.
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Finally, this dismissal is considered a “strike” pursuant to
the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the U.S.
District Clerk is directed to appropriately flag this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?