Turpen v. Ritter et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety ; denying as moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 7 Motion for Recusal. ; denying as moot 8 Motion ; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss and case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 9, 2011. (rw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
RANDY LOYD TURPEN
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 2:11-CV-02132

SGT. RITTER; OFFICER KREGGER;
CAPTAIN CONGER; OFFICER WAGNER;
OFFICER COODY; INMATE JEREMY
MIMMES; OFFICER PARTAIN; NURSE
CARREN; and NURSE LARRA

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 10) filed in this case
on October 7, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for
the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections
being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and this case is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Any
other motions which remain pending in this case are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2011.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE