Turpen v. Ritter et al

Filing 61

ORDER granting 54 Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice and adopting Report and Recommendations in its entirety re 60 . Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 21, 2012. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION RANDY LOYD TURPEN v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:11-CV-02133 SGT. RITTER; OFFICER COODY; OFFICER PARTAIN; OFFICER STAMPS; OFFICER KREGGER; CAPTAIN CONGER; OFFICER WAGNER; SHERIFF BILL HOLLENBECK; NURSE MARCELLA RINSON HYATT, a/k/a NURSE SARA; NURSE CARREN; and NURSE LAURA AQUIRE DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 60) filed in this case on June 29, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 54) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of August, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?