Reed v. Malone's Mechanical, Inc. et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 24, 2012. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION MICHAEL REED v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:11-CV-02135 MALONE’S MECHANICAL, INC. DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF v. GILBERT PROJECT SERVICES, INC. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT JUDGMENT On the 20th day of August, 2012, this matter came on for trial to a duly selected jury consisting of eight members, the undersigned presiding. At the completion of the five-day trial, the case was submitted to the jury on interrogatories and a unanimous verdict was reached as to each interrogatory as follows: INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that there was negligence upon that part of Malone’s Mechanical, Inc. that was a proximate cause of any damages resulting from the occurrence? NO Yes or No Based upon the jury’s answer to the above interrogatory, the jury was not required to complete any remaining interrogatories. The verdict form was signed and dated by the jury foreperson. In accordance with the above verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?