Reed v. Malone's Mechanical, Inc. et al
Filing
63
JUDGMENT that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 24, 2012. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
MICHAEL REED
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 2:11-CV-02135
MALONE’S MECHANICAL, INC.
DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF
v.
GILBERT PROJECT SERVICES, INC.
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
On the 20th day of August, 2012, this matter came on for trial to a duly selected jury
consisting of eight members, the undersigned presiding. At the completion of the five-day trial, the
case was submitted to the jury on interrogatories and a unanimous verdict was reached as to each
interrogatory as follows:
INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that there was
negligence upon that part of Malone’s Mechanical, Inc. that was a proximate cause of any damages
resulting from the occurrence?
NO
Yes or No
Based upon the jury’s answer to the above interrogatory, the jury was not required to
complete any remaining interrogatories. The verdict form was signed and dated by the jury
foreperson. In accordance with the above verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED,
that Plaintiff takes nothing on his Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2012.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?