Hill et al v. GEICO Insurance

Filing 54

JUDGMENT in favor of GEICO Insurance against Darlin J. Hill and that plaintiff take nothing on her complaint; further the matter is dismissed with prejudice and all parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 3, 2012. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION DARLIN J. HILL v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:11-CV-02182 GEICO INSURANCE DEFENDANT JUDGMENT On the 1st day of October, 2012, this matter came on for trial to a duly selected jury consisting of eight members, the undersigned presiding. At the completion of the three-day trial, the case was submitted to the jury and a unanimous verdict was reached as follows: On the underinsured motorist coverage claim of Plaintiff, Darlin Hill, as submitted in Instruction No. 3, we find in favor of: ____________________________________ (Plaintiff Darlin Hill) or Defendant GEICO Insurance______________ (Defendant GEICO Insurance) The verdict form was signed and dated by the jury foreperson. In accordance with the above verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiff takes nothing on her Complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of October, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?