Frith v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), AND, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (6). Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 4, 2012. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
OLIVER PHILLIP FRITH
Case No. 2:11-CV-02209
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security Administration
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) filed in this case on
October 17, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the
Western District of Arkansas. The objection period has passed with no objections being filed by
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed, and this case
is remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.
If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to
Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment
becomes "not appealable" i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v.
Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2012.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?