Jackson et al v. Westcott et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations in its entirety and plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on April 30, 2012. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION JOE NATHAN JACKSON, JR. and CHANDRA LYONS JACKSON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 11-2226 CHARLES WESTCOTT, RACHEL J. SIMS and OFFICER ADDIS CARSON DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 30th day of April 2012, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on January 19, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 4). No objections were filed.1 The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well and report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, fail to state claims on which relief can be granted, or are duplicative of claims asserted in another case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(iii)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). 1 The Court is aware that Plaintiffs’ copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable. However, there was no forwarding address, and despite an internet search, the Court has not found another address for Plaintiffs. Further, it is Plaintiffs’ responsibility to keep the Court apprised of any change in address. AO72A (Rev. 8/82) IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?