Strouss v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 4

ORDER directing the clerk return the IFP application to counsel with directions to provide more specific information as requested in this order, and an amended IFP application should be returned on or before December 20, 2011. Should Plaintiff fail t o comply within the required period of time, her complaint will become subject to summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order, re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Mattie S. Strouss. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on December 6, 2011. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION MATTIE S. STROUSS v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 11-2233 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff has submitted a complaint for filing in this district, together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. The undersigned finds that more information is needed to rule on her IFP application. Plaintiff’s IFP application indicates that she has a husband with whom she owns a 2009 Chevy Cobalt. ECF No. 2, at 2. However, she does not state if her husband is employed, and, if so, the nature of his employment and income. She also does not specify her living arrangements (i.e., whether she rents or owns her home). As such, the clerk is directed to return the IFP application to counsel with directions to provide more specific information regarding Plaintiff’s husband’s employment and the full extent of her property. Plaintiff is directed to file her amended IFP application on or before December 20, 2011. Should Plaintiff fail to comply within the required period of time, her complaint will become subject to summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?