Goforth v. Bruce et al
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety and denying plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; further plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the court finds that this case should be counted as a strike under 28 USC 1915(g) and directing the clerk to place a 1915(g) strike flag on the case. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on May 10, 2012. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
Case No. 2:12-CV-02071
INVESTIGATOR TOM BRUCE;
and SHERIFF RON BROWN
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) filed in this case on
April 13, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the
Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being
filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 3) is DENIED and
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Furthermore, the Court finds that this
case should be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). As such, the Clerk is directed to place
a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2012.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?