Turner v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
ORDER DENYING Defendant Graphic Packaging International, Inc.'s Bill of Costs. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 7, 2014. (jas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
BYRON W. TURNER
Case No. 2:12-CV-02114
GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Currently before the Court are Defendant Graphic Packaging International, Inc.’s (“Graphic
Packaging”) bill of costs in the amount of $1,743.10 (Doc. 38) and Plaintiff Byron W. Turner’s
response in opposition (Doc. 39). On January 23, 2014, the Court ruled in favor of Graphic
Packaging on a motion for summary judgment and dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice.
Graphic Packaging filed a bill of costs on February 3, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 54(d)(1), which states that “[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides
otherwise, costs—other than attorney's fees—should be allowed to the prevailing party.”
In evaluating a prevailing party’s bill of costs, the court is afforded substantial discretion.
Computrol, Inc. v. Newtrend, L.P., 203 F.3d 1064 (8th Cir. 2000) (citing Greaser v. State, Dept. of
Corrections, 145 F.3d 979, 985 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1056 (1998)). The indigency
of the losing party is a factor to consider when determining whether to award costs. Lampkins v.
Thompson, 337 F.3d 1009, 1017 (8th Cir. 2003) (affirming that district court “properly considered
[losing party’s] indigency” in denying some costs and reducing others); Poe v. John Deere Co., 695
F.2d 1103, 1108 (8th Cir. 1982) (“It is of course within a court’s discretion to deny costs because
a plaintiff is poor or for other good reason . . .).
Plaintiff avers in his response in opposition to the bill of costs that he is indigent and “solely
relies on Social Security Disability and food stamps as his sole source of income.” (Doc. 39, p. 1).
Considering Plaintiff’s lack of ability to pay costs and the non-frivolous nature of the lawsuit he
filed, the Court in its discretion declines to award costs in this matter.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Graphic Packaging International, Inc.’s
bill of costs (Doc. 38) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of February, 2014.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?