Day v. USA
ORDER DISMISSING THIS MATTER WITH PREJUDICE and Motions terminated, Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 3, 2012. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
Case Nos. 2:10-CR-20034
BRENDA GOLDEN DAY
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23, Case No. 10-20043)
filed in this case on September 5, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United
States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. The objection period has passed with no
objections having been filed by either party.1
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motions to Vacate (Doc. 88 in case no. 11-20043 and Doc. 20
in case no. 10-20034), filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claims raised by Defendant through such motions,
The Court notes that the Court did receive a letter from Defendant, addressed to Honorable
Judge Holmes, on October 29, 2012. This letter did not appear to object to the Report and
Recommendation and, instead, appeared to be a request to reduce Defendant’s sentence based on a
change in circumstance. Furthermore, the letter was sent and received after the date objections were
due on September 24, 2012. Defendant is advised that, in order for any new claim to be filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255, Defendant must use the appropriate form and follow the procedure as required by
statute in order that it may be determined whether a successive claim under 28 U.S.C. §2255 is
permitted by law in this case.
which the Court also filed as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, case no. 12-cv-02147, are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2012.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?