Pinson et al v. 45 Development, LLC et al

Filing 237

ORDER directing payment of Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 28, 2013. (jas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION CURTIS PINSON and CRISTI PINSON, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 2:12-CV-02160 45 DEVELOPMENT, LLC; CITI TRENDS, INC.; CITI TRENDS, INC. d/b/a CITITRENDS; and BRANDRITE SIGN COMPANY, INC. DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court is an affidavit (Doc. 164) filed by counsel for Plaintiffs. The affidavit was filed pursuant to this Court’s previous order (Doc. 147), in which the Court denied as moot Plaintiffs’ first motion to compel, based on the fact that Defendant Citi Trends, Inc. (“Citi Trends”) responded to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests subsequent to the filing of the motion. The Court directed Plaintiffs to file an affidavit documenting their fees and expenses incurred in bring their first motion to compel. The affidavit filed by Plaintiffs’ counsel documents $229.45 in total expenses and fees. The Court finds the requested fees to be reasonable, and Citi Trends has filed no objections within the seven days given for them to file a response. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Citi Trends pay to Plaintiffs $229.45 in attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in bringing Plaintiffs’ first motion to compel. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2013. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?