Pinson et al v. 45 Development, LLC et al
JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 23, 2013. ***Civil Case Terminated.(jas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
CURTIS and CRISTI PINSON, Individually and as
Husband and Wife
Case No. 2:12-CV-02160
45 DEVELOPMENT, LLC; CITI TRENDS, INC.;
CITI TRENDS, INC. d/b/a CITITRENDS; and
BRANDRITE SIGN COMPANY, INC.
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s order filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Citi Trends, Inc.’s motion for summary
judgment (Doc. 196) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs Curtis and Cristi Pinson’s cross-motion for partial
summary judgment against Citi Trends (Doc. 214) is DENIED; and Plaintiffs’ claims against
Defendants Citi Trends, Inc. and Citi Trends, Inc. d/b/a CitiTrends are DISMISSED WITH
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Brandrite Sign Company, Inc.’s motion for
summary judgment on Citi Trends’ third-party complaint (Doc. 211) is DENIED AS MOOT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Brandrite’s motion for summary judgment on
Plaintiffs’ amended complaint and on Defendant 45 Development, LLC’s cross-claim (Doc. 225)
is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims against Brandrite are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. As 45
Development’s cross-claim against Brandrite is MOOT, it is therefore DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. Brandrite’s cross-claims against 45 Development and Citi Trends are also MOOT and
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant 45 Development’s motion for summary
judgment (Doc. 220) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ claims against 45 Development are DISMISSED
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ amended motion for partial summary judgment
(Doc. 238) is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2013.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?