Jackson v. Leon et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 2 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Further the Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on November 1, 2012. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION CHANDRA LYONS JACKSON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:12-CV-02217 GINA LEON, Adjuster, Liberty Mutual; DIANE DAY, Adjuster, Liberty Mutual; CHAROLETTE MITCHELL; LIBBY (Last Name Unknown), TEC Nurse; BUD (Last Name Unknown), TEC Workers Compensation Supervisor; and DR. JEFFREY EVANS, Cooper Clinic DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) filed in this case on September 20, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. The objection period has passed with no objections being filed by any party. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?