Jackson et al v. Matlock

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Joenathan Jackson, Jr, Chandra Lyons Jackson. Further Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on November 1, 2012. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION CHANDRA LYONS JACKSON; and JOENATHAN JACKSON, JR. v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 2:12-CV-02218 JANET MATLOCK, Chuck Fawcett Real Estate DEFENDANT ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) filed in this case on September 20, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. The objection period has passed with no objections being filed by any party. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED and Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?