Jackson et al v. Matlock

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Joenathan Jackson, Jr, Chandra Lyons Jackson. Further Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on November 1, 2012. (lw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
CHANDRA LYONS JACKSON; and
JOENATHAN JACKSON, JR.
v.

PLAINTIFFS

Case No. 2:12-CV-02218

JANET MATLOCK, Chuck Fawcett Real Estate

DEFENDANT

ORDER
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) filed in this case on
September 20, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for
the Western District of Arkansas. The objection period has passed with no objections being filed by
any party.

The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:
The Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED
and Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2012.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE