Dickason v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 9

JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the 8 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 30, 2013. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION SHERRY S. DICKASON PLAINTIFF v. Civil No. 12-2219 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT J U D G M E N T Now on 30th this day of October 2013, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation dated October 9, 2013, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (14) days parties. have passed without objections being filed States Fourteen by the The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation; reverses the decision of the Commissioner; and remands this case to the Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and cost under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). AO72A (Rev. 8/82) IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ /s/ Robert T. Dawson HONORABLE ROBERT T. DAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?