Garner v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the 15 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 18, 2013. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
SHANA L. GARNER
Civil No. 12-2329
CAROLYN W. COLVIN1, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
J U D G M E N T
consideration the Report and Recommendation (doc. 15) dated October
28, 2013, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United
States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by
The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and
sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is
proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the
Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation; reverses the
Commissioner for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and
cost under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412,
an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment
becomes "not appealable" i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Social Security Commissioner on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin has been substituted for Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as the
defendant in this suit.
appeal has ended.
See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113
S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
HONORABLE ROBERT T. DAWSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?