Bishop v. Davis

Filing 22

ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; granting 15 Motion to Amend, and Plainiff is directed to file an amended complaint adding the Fort Smith Housing Authority as a defendant within (14) days; denying 18 Motion to Change Venue; adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 in toto; granting 20 Motion to Amend Relief Sought and denying 21 Motion to Compel. The court will issue an Amended Initial Scheduling Order. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on July 23, 2013. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION ALLEN BISHOP PLAINTIFF v. Case No.: 13-2053 PATRICIA DAVIS DEFENDANT O R D E R On this 23rd day of July 2013, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on July 3, 2013 (doc. 19) by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. The parties did not file timely objections. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation (doc. 19) is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (doc. 15) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint adding the Fort Smith Housing Authority as a defendant within fourteen (14) days. Further, Plaintiff’s Motion to Change Venue (doc. 18) is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 10) is DENIED. Finally, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Relief Sought (doc. 20) is GRANTED to the extent he may include this request for relief in his amended complaint. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (doc. 21) is DENIED, and the Court will issue an Amended Initial AO72A (Rev. 8/82) Scheduling Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?