Boyd v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
ORDER granting re: 2 and 6 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Social Security Administration Commissioner. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defendant by certified mail, return receipt reque sted, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on March 27, 2013. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
o/b/o A.B., A MINOR
CIVIL NO. 13-2081
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
On March 20, 2013, Plaintiff submitted a complaint for filing in this district, together
with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. Subsequently, an order
was issued directing Plaintiff to provide more specific information regarding her sources of
income. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to the order, Plaintiff submitted an amended in forma pauperis
application on March 27, 2013. ECF No. 6. After review, it is found that Plaintiff is unable to
pay for the costs of commencement of suit and, accordingly, the following order is entered:
Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The court directs that
a copy of the complaint, along with a copy of this order, be served by Plaintiff by certified mail,
return receipt requested, on Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social
Security Administration, as well as Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, and Conner
Eldridge, U.S. Attorney, without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is ordered to answer
within sixty (60) days from the date of service.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of March 2013.
/s/ J. Marschewski
HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?