Hopewell v. Norris

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 19, 2013. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION MICHAEL EDISON HOPEWELL v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:13-CV-02085 S. RYAN NORRIS DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 3) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 4). After reviewing the record de novo as to Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the Magistrate’s reasoning to be sound and further finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrates’ findings. The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate in full. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application (Doc. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2013. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?