Moore v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 49

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Compel according to the rulings made by the court from the bench in the hearing 2/14/14; granting 36 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and discovery is extended to 2/28/14; and denying 36 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on February 13, 2014. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION BRENT MOORE V. PLAINTIFF NO. 13-2092 SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. DEFENDANT ORDER Before the court is the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, Motion to Extend Discovery, and Motion to Stay (See ECF No. 36) filed January 15, 2014. The Motion was referred to the court on January 16, 2014. On January 17, 2014 the court entered an order setting the matter for a hearing on February 3, 2014, but inclement weather required the court to reschedule the hearing for February 12, 2014. A hearing was held on February 12, 2014 and the court made specific rulings from the bench on each request in the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. After discussions with the Defendant's attorney and the Plaintiff's attorney it was determined that the Defendant could comply with the court's rulings on or before February 24, 2014. The attorneys agreed that depositions that had previously been scheduled for February 24th and 25th would be moved to February 27 and 28th. The Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is Granted in Part and Denied in Part according to the rulings made by the court from the bench in the hearing February 12, 2014. The Plaintiff Motion to Extend Discovery is Granted and Discovery is extended to February 28, 2014. The Plaintiff's Motion to Stay the Trial is Denied. Page -1- IT IS SO ORDERED this February 13, 2014. J. Marschewski /s/ HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI Chief United States Magistrate Judge Page -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?