Holloway v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING 19 Motion to Dismiss Party and TERMINATING 23 Motion for Discovery. All claims against Defendant Ray Hobbs are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 8, 2013. (jas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION RICHARD HOLLOWAY v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:13-CV-02104 CORIZON HEALTH, INC.; JOHN DOES A-Z; JANE DOES A-Z; and RAY HOBBS DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court is Defendant Ray Hobbs’ Motion to Dismiss Party, requesting that the complaint against Mr. Hobbs be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 19). Plaintiff Richard Holloway filed a response to the motion (Doc. 22), agreeing to dismiss, and requesting dismissal of, separate defendant Hobbs. Therefore, the Court finds that Mr. Hobbs’ Motion to Dismiss party (Doc. 19) should be and hereby is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendant Ray Hobbs are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Ray Hobbs as a party to this action. Also before the Court is a Motion for Discovery (Doc. 23) filed by Mr. Holloway. It appears to the Court that this document was improperly filed with the Court. It appears to simply be a discovery request and the Court will treat it as such. If Defendants fail to properly respond to a discovery request, Mr. Holloway may file an appropriate Motion to Compel in compliance with Local Rule 7.2(g). The Clerk is therefore directed to TERMINATE Mr. Holloway’s Motion for Discovery (Doc. 23). IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2012. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?