West v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 5

ORDER directing the Plaintiff re 2 to file an amended in forma pauperis application providing more specific information regarding her assets and debts as set forth. Plaintiff should file her amended application by July 24, 2013. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on July 10, 2013. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION MISTIE WEST o/b/o J.W., a minor v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL NO. 13-2173 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff has submitted a complaint for filing in this district, together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. The undersigned finds that more information is needed to rule on Plaintiff’s IFP application. Plaintiff’s IFP application indicates that she and her husband receive a combined monthly income of $3,100.00. ECF No. 2. Under Section 5, Plaintiff does not list any real or personal property. However, under Section 6, Plaintiff states that she makes monthly mortgage and car payments. Additionally, Plaintiff lists no debts or financial obligations under Section 8, although she lists monthly car, mortgage, student loan, and credit card payments in Section 6. As such, Plaintiff is directed to submit an amended IFP application providing more specific information regarding her assets and debts, including estimated value of any assets and amount of any outstanding financial obligations. Plaintiff is directed to file her amended IFP application by July 24, 2013. Should Plaintiff fail to comply within the required period of time, her complaint will become subject to summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of July 2013. /s/ J. Marschewski HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?