Williams et al v. Brown et al

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety; granting defendants' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 18, 2015. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION BOBBY DWAYNE WILLIAMS, ADC # 142732 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:13-CV-02176 SHERIFF RON BROWN, Crawford County Detention Center; and LIEUTENANT VERN CUPP, Crawford County Detention Center DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 35) of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 36). No response to the objections was filed by Defendants. The Court has conducted a de novo review as to all specified proposed findings and recommendations to which Plaintiff has raised objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court cannot discern from Plaintiff’s objections any law or fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s report or recommendations. Rather, the report of the magistrate appears to be well reasoned and the recommendations to be sound. Accordingly, the Court finds that the report of the Magistrate is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY, with the only exception being that Plaintiffs’ claims are to be dismissed with prejudice, as judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate’s report, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. -1- Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2015. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?