Bordock v. Fort Smith Arkansas, City of et al
ORDER directing the Clerk to immediately transfer this case to the Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. Bordock' s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, No. 1, remains pending for adjudication. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/31/13. (kpr) [Transferred from ared on 7/31/2013.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CITY OF FORT SMITH ARKANSAS,
and SEBASTIAN COUNTY HUMANE
Bordock says that, when she was arrested by the Fort Smith poli e in
July 2013, the Sebastian County Humane Society took her eight cats, viol ting
her civil rights. NQ 2. She also says they won't give the cats back unti she
pays $1,200.00. Ibid.
Venue is bad in this District, as Bordock anticipates. NQ 2 at 3.
Smith and the Humane Society reside, for venue purposes, in Seba tian
County. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) & (c). The arrest and seizure took placet ere.
28 u.s.c. § 1391(b)(2).
The interest of justice will best be served by transferring the case. 28
U.S.C. § 1406(a).
The Court directs the Clerk to immediately tra sfer
Bordock's case to the United States District Court for the Western Distri t of
Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. In re Nine Mile Limited, 673 F.2d 242 (8th Cir.
1982). Bordock' s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, NQ 1, remains pen 1ng
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?