Vellon v. Goodman

Filing 24

ORDER granting 20 Motion, Defendant is directing to provide information to the Plaintiff by 5/23/14; and granting 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File; Summary Judgment Motion due by 6/2/2014. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on May 8, 2014. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION EDGAR MARTINEZ VELLON v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 13-2195 CORPORAL CHRIS GOODMAN, Arkansas State Police DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. 20) for a more definite statement. Plaintiff indicates he has received an Arkansas State Police Radio Transmission Log Form from the Defendant. However, he states he cannot decipher the codes, abbreviations, or numbers on the log. In response, Defendant asserts that the log was produced in response to Plaintiff’s request for production. Defendant states there is no basis for requesting a more definite statement. Review of the log indicates that Plaintiff is correct. The log cannot be deciphered by one without knowledge of the codes used. By way of example, one line, under the header “information on call or broadcast,” provides “10-24 678SFA 98eb.” The motion (Doc. 20) is granted. Regardless of what this motion is called, Plaintiff is entitled to know what these codes, abbreviations, or numbers stand for. Defendant is directed to go line by line on the log and indicate what each code, abbreviation, number, letter sequence, etc., means. Defendant is directed to provide this information to the Plaintiff by May 23, 2014. Defendant has filed a motion (Doc. 22) for an extension of time to file his summary judgment motion. The motion (Doc. 22) is granted. Defendant has until June 2nd to file his summary judgment motion. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of May 2014. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?