Bordock v. Wal Mart Stores Inc
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey the orders of this Court. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 9, 2014. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
LAURIE BORDOCK,
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 14-2035
WALMART STORES, INC.
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Currently before the Court is the report and recommendation
filed in this case on July 27, 2014, by the Honorable James R.
Marschewski,
Chief
United
District of Arkansas.
States
Magistrate
(Doc. 10).
for
the
Western
No objections were filed to
the report and recommendation.
The
Court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
report
and
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to
obey the orders of this Court.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of September, 2014.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?