Bordock v. Wal Mart Stores Inc

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey the orders of this Court. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 9, 2014. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION LAURIE BORDOCK, PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 14-2035 WALMART STORES, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Currently before the Court is the report and recommendation filed in this case on July 27, 2014, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United District of Arkansas. States Magistrate (Doc. 10). for the Western No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The Court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well report and and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey the orders of this Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of September, 2014. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?