Ehrlich v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) as set forth in the 15 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 9, 2015. (hnc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
TERRI ELLEN EHRLICH
CIVIL NO. 2:14-CV-02052
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
For reasons stated in a Memorandum Opinion of this date, I conclude that the decision
of the Commissioner denying benefits to the Plaintiff is not supported by substantial evidence
and should be reversed and remanded for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty (60) days from entry of the judgment on the docket
in which to appeal.
If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access
to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the
judgment becomes “not appealable,” i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See
Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),
IT IS SO ORDERED and ADJUDGED this 9th day of February, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Ford
HONORABLE MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?