Noble v. Delay et al

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss Case. Further terminating as moot 25 Motion for Discovery; terminating as moot 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; terminating as moot 28 Motion to Stay; terminating as moot 33 Motion for Hearing; terminating as moot 36 Motion ; terminating as moot 36 Motion to Produce. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 2, 2015. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION LEONARD NOBLE v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:14-CV-02164 GUNNER DELAY, Sebastian County Prosecuting Attorney; and DANIEL SHUE, Sebastian County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 32) of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff Leonard Noble’s objections (Doc. 34) and supplement (Doc. 35). No response to the objections was filed by Defendants. Noble has also filed a motion for hearing (Doc. 33) and a “motion to acknowledge documents and resubmit motion for in camera review of documents” (Doc. 36). The Court has conducted a de novo review as to all specified proposed findings and recommendations to which Plaintiff has raised objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c). Upon due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings and recommendations and that the Magistrate’s report does not otherwise contain any clear error. The Magistrate’s report (Doc. 32) is therefore ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are TERMINATED AS MOOT. Judgment will be entered accordingly. -1- IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 2015. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?