Cobble v. Clarksville, City of et al

Filing 12

JUDGMENT re 11 ORDER that the petition is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction as to any claims asserted pursuant to 28 USC 2241 or 2254; further ordered that any claims that might be construed pursuant to 42 USC 1983 or any other federal statute are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 5, 2015. (rw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
v.

PETITIONER
Case No. 2:14-CV-02175

CITY OF CLARKSVILLE; and JOHN DOE

RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order entered in this case on this date, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED,
and ADJUDGED that the petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction
as to any claims asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 or 2254.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any claims that might be construed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 or any other federal statute are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three
strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
IT IS SO ADJUDGED this 5th day of February, 2015.

/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE