Cobble v. Clarksville, City of et al
JUDGMENT re 11 ORDER that the petition is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction as to any claims asserted pursuant to 28 USC 2241 or 2254; further ordered that any claims that might be construed pursuant to 42 USC 1983 or any other federal statute are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 5, 2015. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Case No. 2:14-CV-02175
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE; and JOHN DOE
Pursuant to the Order entered in this case on this date, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED,
and ADJUDGED that the petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction
as to any claims asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 or 2254.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any claims that might be construed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 or any other federal statute are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three
strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
IT IS SO ADJUDGED this 5th day of February, 2015.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?