Cobble v. Clarksville, City of et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 16 Motion to reverse the judgment; denying 17 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on March 13, 2015. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION DANIEL ERIC COBBLE v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:14-CV-02183 CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, ARKANSAS; and THE ARKANSAS STATE PATROL DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations (Doc. 19) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. The Court has conducted a careful review of the findings and recommendations and of the timely objections filed by Petitioner Daniel Eric Cobble. After reviewing the record de novo as to Mr. Cobble’s objections, the Court finds the Magistrate’s reasoning to be sound and further finds that Petitioner’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrates’ findings. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate are approved and adopted as this Court’s findings. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cobble’s motions to reverse the judgment (Doc. 16) and to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 17) are DENIED. Further, some of Mr. Cobble’s filings1 contain language, directed at the Court, that is unsuitable for a Court filing and unnecessary to advance any pertinent legal or factual argument. Mr. Cobble is advised not to use inappropriate or abusive language in any communication with the Court. Mr. Cobble is expected to behave with the decorum expected of all litigants who appear before, or file pleadings with, this Court. 1 See, e.g., Doc. 20, ¶ 5 (“I am not in prison for aggravated stalking you f------ retard”). IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of March, 2015. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?