Martin v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Filing
15
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) as set forth in the 14 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 25, 2015. (hnc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
JULIA A. MARTIN
V.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL NO. 2:14-cv-2199-MEF
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, the decision of the Commissioner
denying benefits to the Plaintiff is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed and
remanded for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have
sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal.
If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to
Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the
judgment becomes “not appealable” i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has
ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2015.
/s/ Mark E. Ford
HONORABLE MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?